Différences entre les versions de « Discussion utilisateur:Interwicket »

→‎Interwicket and typographic apostrophe : special case for fr.wikt, different from all others?
(→‎Interwicket and typographic apostrophe : special case for fr.wikt, different from all others?)
:: I agree that this is an issue. One solution might be to change Interwicket (special case). Another solution might be to add redirects between the two kinds of apostrophes on en.wiktionary (and on all other wiktionaries as well), and that all interwiki bots accept links to redirects for wiktionaries. [[Utilisateur:Lmaltier|Lmaltier]] 26 avril 2009 à 06:33 (UTC)
:: Also note that ’ is the '''normal''' character to be used as a typographic apostrophe (whatever the name it may have in standards...) [[Utilisateur:Lmaltier|Lmaltier]] 26 avril 2009 à 06:33 (UTC)
::: It may be "normal" for French, but it is ''wrong'' in English. The entry here at (for example) [[wasn’t]], is incorrect, as an English word it should be at [[wasn't]]. (English keyboards don't ''have'' [[’]] ;-)
::: It would be possible to "special case" this just for the French wikt, but there are many many special cases overall. Please see [[:en:User:Interwicket/redirects]]. What we should do is enable linking to redirects on all wikts, and then all of the special cases can be handled as needed. (In this special case other wikts would either use ’ (U+2019) for French words, or redirect them to the usual ASCII apostrophe, as they prefer.)
::: And do note that this is the proper function of redirects in wikis, we just need to allow the interwiki links to use them; not linking to redirects was an extremely poor design decision (before my time) [[Utilisateur:Robert Ullmann|Robert Ullmann]] 28 avril 2009 à 04:29 (UTC)
46

modifications